From the CEO’s Desk
Clarification of the revised Section 88 Maternity Notice: Due for Implementation 1 July 2007
Continuity of Care It is clear the model of care continues to be one in which all maternity care is delivered through an LMC. It is also clear there is an expectation each LMC shall have adequate back up arrangements.
As set out in the Guide to the Notice the new "Notice” (2007) does recognise and codifies current realities of group practice . Where LMCs work in a group the members of the group back each other up. In such a context, it was expected the LMC would make their women aware of the arrangements and ensure, so far as possible, the women met the potential back ups during the antenatal period.
There is, however, no change to the expectation that the LMC provides continuity of care through out pregnancy , labour and birth and the postnatal period. LMCs cannot therefore work in “shifts” as such a practice is in conflict with the obligation to provide continuity of care from an individual LMC. The MOH accepted the workforce shortage in some areas may mean an LMC may call for their back up but the back up may not be available (e.g. as they are already committed elsewhere).
We specifically asked MOH regarding the use of a medical call centre staffed by nurses to manage and triage calls to LMCs (as many GPs, especially rural GPs, use to manage their after hours calls). The MOH were adamant the use of such a service would not be acceptable to them. We asked about the situation where an LMC could call for their back up when they felt unsafe due to the hours they had worked (e.g. an extended labour over 12 hours) and the back up was unavailable. The MOH indicated the LMC should, in such cases, negotiate with the facility to hand over care based on the needs of the woman and the individual circumstances.
Authorisation
We were advised all existing LMCs who hold a HealthPAC agreement and PAYE number will automatically be granted an authorisation effective 1 July 2007.
It was noted authorisations will be tied to DHB regions to assist MOH to manage the interdistrict funding flows. This will not normally affect an LMC so long as the bulk of their practice is in one DHB region. It is accepted by MOH this may be more of an issue in areas like Auckland and Wellington where there are DHBs in close proximity. If an LMC’s practice is such more than 50% of their women are from a DHB region to which their authorisation is not linked, the LMC may need to obtain a second authorisation and separate their claims so they are submitted according to the DHB region (and therefore the authorisation) in which the woman resides. This is expected to be rare.
National Immunisation Register (NIR)
Where circumstances are such the facility does not notify NIR or for home births, the LMC is responsible to ensure NIR receive the information required.
First and Second Trimester.
MOH advised if an LMC should see a woman to provide what was previously a single service episode (e.g. threatened miscarriage in first trimester), the fee to be claimed will be the first partial payment for the first and second trimester.
MOH advise the revised rules allow for more than one LMC to see a woman in the first and second trimester and still be paid for services provided. For example: In this case:
LMC 1 would receive the first partial payment of $196.88 (GST incl.)
LMC 2 would receive the first partial payment of $196.88 (GST incl.)
LMC 3 would receive payment for the complete module of $337.50 (GST incl.)
In this second case:
LMC 2 would receive payment for the complete module of $337.50 (GST incl.)
LMC 3 would receive the second partial payment of $140.62 (GST incl.)
This is very good news for LMCs as it means the LMC does not lose funding when the woman transfers care at any time during the first and second trimesters.
The examples above assume the LMCs are not employed by or contracted to the same maternity provider (e.g. a PHO). In that case, the maternity provider is entitled to only one payment per service provided, even if that service is provided by more than one LMC.
Non
The only exception appears to allow LMCs to claim for urgent pregnancy carewhere they see a woman whose residence and LMC are in a different region.
Deadlines
Also, the new Notice reiterates the requirement all claims:
For example the postnatal module claim can only be submitted when the module is complete including the referrals to well child and primary care services.
It must be submitted within six months of the service being completed. Claims submitted after this date will have a penalty of 10% deducted.
Services being provided at the implementation date MOH have clarified the effective date for determining whether a claim is paid at the scale to 30 June or at the scale from 1 July is the date on which the service was completed.
That is, if the second trimester ends on 30 June, the fee payable will be the fee at the current scale. If the second trimester ends on 1 July, the fee payable will be the fee due under the new Notice.
Please note claims submitted after 1 July without the new authorisation number will be rejected.
Implementation
MOH plan to generate the new agreement number at the end of the second week in May and then send out a covering letter to all agreement holders. Attached to the letter will be:
We ask all members to advise us as soon as they receive their new authorisation number so we can update our system ready for the changeover on 1 July.
Other Issues
Transfer of Section 88 Maternity Services Notice funding to DHBs
We were advised by MOH they could not comment on the subject as the possible transfer of funding to DHBs is still being considered and will need to be submitted to Cabinet before any action is taken.
We were advised it was unlikely the issue would be considered by Cabinet within the next two months.
Transfer of maternity funding to PHOs
While we cannot, at this time, see any benefit to LMCs which would make joining a PHO a desirable option. However, we have insufficient information on which to base any informed discussion.
We will continue to look at this issue and update members as more information becomes available.
Maternity Providers
The Board will be considering whether changing the nature and structure of SAMCL from our current status of a claims management and support organisation to the status of maternity provider is desirable.
There are a number of factors to be considered and these will be discussed in a future issue of Tall Poppies.
No decision on this subject will be made until members have been given the opportunity to discuss the implications and express their preferences.
If any member has any specific question they would like to ask, please contact me accordingly.
Tony Mansfield CEO