Cecile's Comment
HELPING HANDS FOR MIDWIVES
By now all midwives will have received the Midwifery Council’s consultation document inviting feedback about the regulation, training and scope of practice of the midwifery assistant in NZ. This document has had wide coverage, including consumers, DHBs and other maternity facilityproviders. I know from experience that midwives are notalways very good at responding to questionnaires, but I hope they do so inthis case, since it affects midwives more than anyone else.
There is little doubt that midwifery shortages will continue to be a problem in this country for the foreseeable future. We also know that hospitals are already employing maternity health care assistants (MHCAs), many of whom are doing a sterling job at supporting overworked midwives. But their training has been rather ad hoc, varying in different areas, and their tasks dictated by the changing needs of the work area.
It appears that we have come full circle: when I started working in the neonatal unit at National Womens Hospital in 1978, we had hospital aides, Karitane nurses, enrolled and obstetric nurses in our department. The aides were expert at feeding the premature babies, who were quite a challenge to feed and wind. The Karitane nurses and enrolled/obstetric nurses also did a lot of hands‐on care, theoretically working under the supervision of the registered nurses and midwives, but in actual fact, often teaching them if they were new to the ward. They were valuable members of the team. In the delivery units, hospital aides assisted at births, facilitated breastfeeding, showered women after delivery and bathed babies. Enrolled and obstetric nurses were excellent theatre nurses at caesarean sections.
Gradually, the demand for more highly trained staff led to registered nurses and midwives taking over most of the tasks previously undertaken
In Holland, MHCAs complete a 3‐year course, must pass an exam, and work under midwife or GP supervision. Their scope of practice includes necessary household chores, help with breastfeeding, care of older children, instruction and teaching, providing comfort and confidence with baby cares, and assisting at deliveries. They are essential to the continuity of the high rate of home births in Holland, since they provide much of the postnatal care, and thus free the midwives to attend more deliveries. Most midwives attend 150 births per annum, working in groups in order to be able to take time off.
The Dutch midwifery programme was increased from 3 to 4 years in 1994, and recruitment is very competitive. In 1979, the title of “idwife”(vroedvrouw) was replaced by “erloskundige”–expert in obstetrics ‐ while obstetricians were called gynaecologists. Midwives have more obstetric training than GPs, and can “ssist birth with patience”–still the most important condition for normal obstetrics. In Holland, the existence of the MHCA has elevated the midwife’ status.
I would like to see a formalized, comprehensive MHCA training programme, and a paid trainee intern year for midwives after their 3‐year degree course, which would ease the midwifery shortage and increase new midwives’expertise and confidence.
Virtually every country has experienced increased medicalisation of childbirth since the 1970s. In Holland the LSCS rate is around 8%. It would be nice to think we could increase the home birth rate in this country, particularly since it would reduce our rising LSCS rate. If we had trained MHCAs who could provide the home care & support that Dutch women receive, more people might choose home birth as an option.
Cecile O’Driscoll